31. 80
under them hable, there women will also
fall under the sections applying surpaterea hollets.
42
14. The qucation of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unabic
to agree; and for its due consideration I
would moite Your Lordship's careful
Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordeiance 12 of 1857 by declion 4, the averment on bath
attention to rections 19 and 63 sie
athly live persons before the Magistrate
a house was occupied
us a bottel, 100 allowed to be received as aufficient lordince of the fact. This enactment was not
1867 ; but by the Erdmance 2° of that year the Jurisdiction was Cowayed to the Registrar. Eneral, who heard the cases in private . By Ordenance
N°. 2 of 1876 the pirisdiction was again Emoryed to the Magistrales, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if wither party objected, and wiltont the acristance of the above mentioned partes
His Section 4 of Ordinance 12
4/185 24/18577-
& Mis state of things that the present
difficulty of concorching "they" brothel reepers
allowed
However, to follow the instructions more closely and provide a more accurate output, here is the revised version with some corrections and formatting:31. 80
Under them liable, there women will also
fall under the sections applying supraterritorial lets.
42
14. The question of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unable
to agree; and for its due consideration I
would moite Your Lordship's careful
Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordinance 12 of 1857 by section 4, the averment on oath
attention to sections 19 and 63 sie
athly live persons before the Magistrate
a house was occupied
as a brothel, was allowed to be received as sufficient evidence of the fact. This enactment was not
1867; but by the Ordinance 2 of that year the Jurisdiction was Conveyed to the Registrar General, who heard the cases in private. By Ordinance
No. 2 of 1876 the jurisdiction was again vested in the Magistrates, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if either party objected, and without the assistance of the above-mentioned partes
His Section 4 of Ordinance 12
4/1857 24/1857-
& Mis state of things that the present
difficulty of concorching "they" brothel keepers
allowed
Here is the HTML output withtags.
31. 80
Under them liable, there women will also
fall under the sections applying supraterritorial lets.
42
14. The question of procedure to the inly pouch on which the Attorney-General and MS. Jushee Russell have been unable
to agree; and for its due consideration I
would moite Your Lordship's careful
Inclosure 1, bearing in mind the past history of this posit. In Ordinance 12 of 1857 by section 4, the averment on oath
attention to sections 19 and 63 sie
athly live persons before the Magistrate
a house was occupied
as a brothel, was allowed to be received as sufficient evidence of the fact. This enactment was not
1867; but by the Ordinance 2 of that year the Jurisdiction was Conveyed to the Registrar General, who heard the cases in private. By Ordinance
No. 2 of 1876 the jurisdiction was again vested in the Magistrates, without the power of hearing the cases in private, if either party objected, and without the assistance of the above-mentioned partes
His Section 4 of Ordinance 12
4/1857 24/1857-
& Mis state of things that the present
difficulty of concorching "they" brothel keepers
allowed