It would be better in my opinion to make it a part of the Registrar's duties and to table his part in the 4 apply for a special commission of the
Should be to adorn.
In every application made to the undersigned section have been asked to appoint Registrar and in the case I did appoint him on the understanding that as it was no part of the duties imposed upon him under the Code he should
receive the same remuneration for trouble as would be recorded if any official person had been appointed. But I then thought and still think
Not such a turn is objectionable.
If these various duties are committed to the Registrar I think it would be an convenience to suitors and to the public generally. I think also that the revenue of the court would probably be considerably augmented and that with these additional duties, together with the representation of
the income of the Court and the greatly decreased cost in consequence to the public of maintaining the Staff of the Court that their Lordships the Secretary of State might be induced favourably to reconsider the question of
I've made the following corrections: 1. Corrected spelling errors (e.g., "Muck" to "think", "baruns" to "various", "convsuance" to "convenience", "auquinted" to "augmented", "remmeration" to "remuneration", "reccword" to "recorded", "amp moitical" to "any official", "Nach" and "Nat" removed as they seemed to be OCR errors or unnecessary characters, "Elati" removed as it seemed to be an incomplete or incorrect word, "rs." left as is assuming it's an abbreviation). 2. Fixed spacing issues and removed extra spaces. 3. Rejoined broken sentences where necessary. 4. Restored paragraph breaks to improve readability. 5. Applied minimal alteration to the original sentences. 6. Output is in HTML format using `` for paragraphs.