Dany as Siter
direct an amendments in this respect
(Thurs tifon now compristil of man within 24 home of Bommithing the crime, a it is bad golf even to the the hands of gnation umaussans
আ
#
By the old law the party to be time secure his cody of the rohin füre days befor Frink, so the change is not great but it is in the wrong direction _ I would point this out fairing the abo reasons, a way that the bitter Irinafle seems to be that the Canne Should be able to port dring a crimine to trial at any
shme dh
after he is committed, unly he is likely to be prejudice in his defence: but I am not sure that washme diest an amendment. (In many cases at #King The Evidman is very simple and Very a there is no nasem why they shoes not ho tried the day
direct
After the prisonen har ban Committed ~)
Sanction the thire Orkinmens
6.3
Rewa Mar 6.
E. a.
7
D
March
M.Y
*
N.10-
#December 1882.
Mey Lord,
3499
RECP
REGE 28 FEB 37,
82
Government House,
Hong Kong, 17th January, 1883.
I have the honour.
to submit for Her Majesty's Grasions
Allowance and Confirmation Ordinance No22 of 1882 to amend the Supre
he Right Honourable be Earl of Derby,
Court
foolboyjesty' bincipal cheretary of oltate for the Colonies,
Vo