attached to the ordinance,
others
by
rules
da to be drawn up under Section 18.
There seems to me no natural division
between the three
As to pronographe despatch and the
-2.0
the corr
Covering
of
and the gond Lection
the Attorney general's 2nd report
or
subject of
on the
detention of frismes after
the expiration of their term of imprisonment,
I think that with Mi Marsh that Ord:
穸
·2·0·1878.
should be
and such detection
with.
away
Part1.
simply repeated,
detection thereby
thereby wholly
done
Lord Himberley's despatch of 6. Oct. 82. [.16424. ] approves
M: Tonnochy's Baggestions Subject Co
Whart
contained in
desiatale dental of
par... the 19th
on
the
Mi
I do
dee any hist
for hos
Rules (made part
therefore
he womenbed
refueled 5 the other
of the wor
the defor
1. of Mr Tonnody's
of Jan. 1880 [1
Cerlan
品
1880 on the Sam
d
not understand.
Water Tonnocky's supportion.
Me
Thach mbil
mepay and
homitted
EW
proceedings by
the Frommer
Coth
Oh
Grain Celang are
Inlet & the contul other secreting gostate. Iwe no obsition to the appointeuento bling nominally restor in the former
Ew
21
but his suggestions appear to me to allow of 24 hour detention by way of punish
ment not as
enquiry:
fuliminary to magisterial
I think it would be
Simplest and fairest to abolish Such detention altogether
Turing now to the ordinance
See. 1. Subsec-6.
ke
marginal
note.
if debtns wards are specialy mentioned
should not prisons for femaler and
Juveniles
Oleo lase
be also specially mentioned,
wish to
distinguish
clearly from mator for the frisons for males
x
Subsec. *
them
ordinary
Schoe. e. See marginal nota
Subsec &. See what the
par. 3. of
governor says in par. 3.
his
despatch; and see my marginal
notes
The subsection would