Had
the
to
}
گے
I could have
Arind
an
version
346
that Sir Thomas Wade's
at
he wrote for information to fir Thomast in Thanias Wades reported to the Foreign
your lordship when I was in London Office my action on that occasion. referred papers disposed of the newspaper paragraph, as I am concerned, by mentioning declined to encourage
bound to add of my conversations with him mentioning that Scking is not literally accurate. the proposed and what I told him any way, refusing Mere Samuel, who came to transmit the scheme to your lords spiumtaff with
effe when he
نہیں
arrangement
cut
or to the Indian Government
referred
to
اع سالا
the
of
He confuses
about the
the mission of
to
F
a letter from the Foreign Office, to Li Hung Chang.
w-as
route
Mili
and
that &
correspondence respecting Open with the mission of the Tastai Ma; and be conducted by the British Minister the entirely misapprehends the objection Sir Thomas Wade, to whom I therefore to this mode of dealing with the Aperem
Our Ho Amei. Having this di traffic,
thus de traffic, and which objection I expressed to him in the matter, and only when he pressed mix myself ups having returned the papers including
about the Jord Li Hung Chang's memorial arrangement to Mr Ho Amie. I officia what I had done to Sir Thomas reported
I should be glad if your lordship ascertain from
"Earl Granville whethe
B
for
opinion.
I have hehmor the
My Lord. morsoviding for vand