74
opinion
the subject.
In reply
Я
am to acquaint you for the +
information of the bare of Kimberley, that this Board have referred the question to their Engineer Surveyor
in Chief, and they concur with him
that one
inthinking that
Suurveryor cannot
efficiently perform the amount of
work which the statement submitted
MASURY
with Mr. Brewer's letter shows to be
required. The Board of Trade
also of the opinion, looking
are
OREIGN
to the
salary proposed for the Assist ant
Surveyor, that if one is appointed
he