And as without
far
A
any
I have heard inconvenient results (
G.W. J. 19 June
GWR. 19 Jame
2 sendment.
Send copies 7 gruppested amen
Thai and
Mr Pric's paper
(in
8470
& the
O. A. G. - say that Leid Kimberly coment advice Her Majesty to affect to the Ordinance
in its present form.
Ѐ
that provisions corresponding
to es. 42 and 43 of the hamuwags
ad tek
brat
au.
At 1870 should 1870
that the titrativo provisions for
appeal from the decisions
artbaters t
the Gort in Council should to repeated
& that in how
hershemburley's pinen it aruldh bitter to repeat the whole of the arbitration
63
causes 83-77
ว
49
they should be considered for tidy the Add but that
Lord Kimberley does not insist on their King adopted
and that the more
conornient course would be to repeal
the Adinance and now exact a
new
one with the recepary alterations
EW 27.5
Draft atonce
Consideratio
/43
kur ar
clause
Rm
for Lulli
درد
??cause?
se
To purchase
the Namway, Art is ther purchase.
I have added to the Draft
A
supportion that the price shall to determined
pridge ofthe Supreme Court - subject
+84-85 and to provide
as to compensation shall
5
that in all cases disputes
I determined by a judge in Summary purisdiction
Saundin as recommended & Arfustice sau din and sor Price the company tuulty & required to make a Kat would be sotton upeated
5
deponit
that
as in ghan
B. 9 Trade
as
To so 6. §. 72,04
suppertions of the B. g
£31 othe Adinance, as to the emision of the
and "reasonable" on oxicius sections,
the addition.
decisions of th
clause furing
A.La.
and as
appeal from.
Surutger find the fremoz
that while if the word being upen
in Consiliul h adipted
besif charge wake a profectin
deportativ Curit duld wander the maincity Mysertions ofthe B. and there
der Prin
of the cost
In appeal 4 the Full Cont
England
a
refree is affinate for the parpere of
BURY
B.
the Bonde- bat who could appeint
A
refferce in this belong ? the foot hing
part 15 the maller in despeiti.
Ew 27.
Yer This will be Yu
impurements Rui 11
ON