also those who hold foreign qualifications which are
bonä
fide equivalent to those required by the Medical Act of 1858. (and) Ishould add and they would probably ape Amended Ach, passed
those required by any or to be passed, subsequently to 1858.)
And thirdly it does not appear the they desire to make Registration in such Register compulsory on Chinese practitioners
practising among
a
Chinese.
It is obvious that this is part of
large Imperial question. What is desirable in this matter in Hong Kong wond presumably be desirable, mutatis mutandis -
in other Colonies; and it may
be added
that what would be reasonable in the
be
those
persons
resident in
Colonies in this respect, would also, under
conditions,
proper in the mother Counting viz : that the medical Register should truly represent the United Kingdom who possess the " requisite knowledge and skill for the
efficient practice of their Profession" who soena obtained, and by whatsoever
Licensing.
(2)
13
Licensing Body recognized by the Imerical
Council, licensed .
This subject has been fully discussed as regards Great Britain and Treland in the medical Council.
It seems
to me desirable to
the
on
forward for the information of Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, the accompaning paper the Amendment of the medical Act, where -in the principle involved will be seen clearly stated in pp 6 to 11 in Report II on the Derritorial Range of ditles to Practise": Pages
25 to 50 of the same Volume containing documents which bear on the general question of the Status of Indian, Colonial, and Foreign Practitioners, in the Country, the Colonies, and in Foreign Countries.
In other
From these papers the Earl of "Kimberly will gather during
that
Gladstone's administration 1870-1 and
the Earl of Beaconsfield
again, in that
of
in