not I
imagine
in
law ovuride the
ordinance
bid 2.1.78 recognised by implication this fover of flogging (1199/79)
And the Home
its discontinuance
ffice advised
13890 (79)
f
Upon this loe arbed the opinion of
we
Sir Heuressy
government and & replied
the Cocal
with an ordinance
7%
1880
simply
abolishing the power: (17657/80)
pending guttic explanations
this ordinance was disallowed:
Therefore the powa is still given by lave to the Suferintendent, though it is not I think allowed as a matter
of fact.
Pakaps, as the committee
recommended the abolition
876 д
thies
may be thought
234
powe, it
Safer
to abolish
it, but I cannot see that it
Can
possibly
I prefer to
abstest
it.
K
to the
Vase
In
Governor
1880
2 cases
be abused if a report
ing
required
there were
in each
8 a pacenetly only of corporal punishment
to 3080 prisoners
for prison offences d it is not Whose authority they
stated on
were
inflicted
13. As to from 7. I sabit
a craft to Cylon aning thank
Jankar.
the
CP.d
2. Oct.