175
99
174
The documents now before ces furnish important evidence on
Thy
this point.
show that Dr Eitil's position had been the entject of canful discussion. The maitinal passages showing the
course of that discussion and the result
to which it led, so far as effecti preent question an as follows.
h
the
Wrap. 4:43 of 19 April 1888
the Sientan of State Says:-
" Dr Eitil shall discharge the duty of head interpreter in the law
Gio
head
in the law courts, and
interpster shall organise and "Superintând a staff of subordinatio
"Sufficient for the purpose.
"
hi
Ex
5605
h
spl brspatch hugs of the
прв
98
20th June, 1881 Sir John Pope Simoneasy
Ea 137941
Says:-
"The the tropatch h: 437 19 April 1881,
"Your Lordships xpresses the opinions "that Delitel should be appointed " Head heterpreter of the Supreme Court " and Superties of the Staff of hitspectors. " For the latter, post he is eminently. "qualified
but I do not thank
" It would be fair to the public interests
" or to himself to ask Dr likt to take
" the post of Stend Kettifortes in the " Court", for which I now ncommand. M
"Ball"
h