148
149
86
Ordinance.
3.
The practice of
The Court
ie Dr biteli appointinent
12 13 14
has
admit
ઞઞ ર્ ।
1: nh
been
Rich
his discharging such
%
"duties.
The work
of interpretation
has
4
" have
been
by Chan Jai k
chid
for exclusively
Ewang;
the
the
ewarn trandator
Court
"I do not think therefore
{
been condereted in the
as before by the
writer perties of
the
Fed', arvader
Court, apported?. bairt,
AAA
*
appeal
that
there is anything to
الم
that Dr. Mitel had any
where that D
general diety which would
uwalov resfr
# 1-0
hility with
respect to out translations
7
mard
act
1.
A
fram.
the
hav
енег вете
And
abn
made
Court,
of
to Dh beitel, and
translations
Criminal
officially
in the
bout, when
vouched
for at all.
-hove
in the
anything to when it, it
A D# 1
I d
lee
it. But this
7
کم بسته م
mjuk to
is just
AZRAAMA
what is
Seitel's
when Dr factib's act
whow
is