319
my Subordinates. This not recessary in my opinion
the Auditor General to make personal Audit of the accounts of the Supreme Court. There
for
A
are
other Departments which
importance
More
of for than the Supreme Court, and
my
whole time would not
auffice if I had to personally, andit all the more important Departments of Government_
I have frequently been to the Inpreme Court to ascertain by personal inspection that
properly
the auditing
ix
conducted. The accounto since
the begining of 1879 have been
audited, and this is now done regularly every month. So far
ax
expenditure is concerned
I think the present system of checks will prevent any Officer of the Court from appropriating monies that have been paid in and brought to account - Every item of expenditure is also checked by
a voucher. But in
Bandrupley and Insolvency
there is no
nothing to prevent money being received and not brought to account at all, and after speaking to Beads Jackson & Hotton on this subject
have some to the conchiaion. that the only possible cheath on such practices would be by the Creditors taking some interest in Bankruptcy envia
and supervising
what is done by the Official Assignee - This unfortunately is not done, and