Seep. 3.57
be given Committee, & probably it was intended to pay for them all from the Vote for Reception of the Princes. But Either
the fovernor
to Each member of the Reception of such
M. Bowdler or
t
were
Careless add a settling about the cost, until it was too late, and the Bill came in and much astonished
the fovernor by its amount.
It has now been paid and Mr
Marsh asks whether it is to be charged to the several votes in the manner
the fovernor's Warrant.
given
on
Die erdgin State ente dette to the
suphin wiches
грибов,
There
are de
several photographes
left in the (olmy (three coping
been sent home).
of Each
having
Perhaps these might be sold.
417
"At any rate the Vote for Reception
of the Princes ought to be charged with all of the Photographes, which afford.
An exceeded $981 1$/1122 for photosikl
consequen
Aax 35
Sex
10012
Eur
that Vote can
? Ask whether there is
any of the
the
Reception Fund available for
of the photography,
payment of more
and ask on what principle the propond division of the cost was made,
specially why
so much was
to the Afforestation Depo Vote,
4.73 of sucres (enspect, it was
Bowdler
poses to charge
t
а
charged
that
balance uney
because
Fund had a good
8/4" #1558-50 pended] suggest the sale of the
lead of $2,158.
>
remaining
Photoes, and defer
giving final mistinctions mitil receipt of further report. [The three who managed the fovernor & Mesors. Tonnocly
all in England, & might
this affair
Deane are all in perhaps beable to explain it ] G.W.J. J June
I de prot know what may have happened in Colonies
بھی