by
"grand jury
in this Country to find a "true" Bill where thee evidence is exparte
"only
or such as with endence on both
sides would induce a krajietrate to
G
comment for trial, and in explanation
of this way be added that a "Myitrate is clearly bound, in the
Exercise
of a sound discretion, not to
commit any ou
one unless a prima facie. case is made out against-lin the witnesses entitled to a reasonable
by
degree of credit. The Justices ought not Merefore to balance the evidence and decute according as at preponderates, for this would, in fact; be taking repor Ammaelves the punctions of the
petty jury
The Reging,
the case; but,
they
ན་
5-3
160
they should consider whether or not tha evidence makes out a strong or probable
o teu a
one
conflicting ease of south in any
of which cases they alwuld couveur the accused to treat. If however, poutta slender nature of the evidence, the
unworthinees of the witnesses, or the conclusive proof of i
the
innocence produced on part of the accused, they feel that the case is not sustained, and that if they sent at for trial be must be w acquitted, they should discharge the
accused
(Argued) B. L. Mcallen
3rd December, 1981.
Allory Savval.