SECRET
Page 286
In discussion it was argued that the problems which had arisen on the development of the Spey engine for the Phanton should not be over-stressed and that they need not affect the engine design reputation of Rolls Royce; the development of a re-heat system for a supersonic engine was recognised as a very difficult task and other engine designers had encountered similar problems. What would
be important would be the speed and extent of the firm's success in overcoming their difficulties. As regards the Ferranti navigation/
attack system, it was likely that the difficulties being experienced
on the Spoy/Phantom would become known publicly; it was important
therefore to establish quickly the facts about the contractual
arrangements between the airframe contractors and Ferranti and what
if anything had been done to press for the inclusion in these of
penalty clauses. We should then consider whether it would be desirable to make public the facts of the situation on the Spey/Phanton, covering both the engine and the navigation/attack system. In the meantime
pressure should continue to be exerted on both Rolls Royce and Ferranti to regain lost ground on their programmes.
The Committee
(1)
B
Took note of the statements by the Defence Secretary
and the Ministry of Technology.
(2) Invited the Minister of Technology, in consultation with
the Defence Secretary, to investigate and report to the Committee on the contractual position between McDonnell and Ferranti for the navigation/attack system for the Spey/Phantom.
(3) Invited the Minister of Technology, in consultation with
the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Defence Secretary, to consider and report to the Committee on the possibility of making public the facts of the Spey/Phantom situation as regards both the engine and the navigation/attack system.
Cabinet Office, S.W.l.
11th October 1967
что Зако
Page 286
SECRET
Page 286