CONFIDENTIAL

Page 275

Discussion showed that the Committee agreed that formal advice to

the Sultan on constitutional progress should not be given for the reasons

adduced by the Commonwealth Secretary. There was also general agreement that we should delay giving notice of termination of the Agreement in view

of the risk of retaliation by the Sultan, and of possible effects on the

stability of the area. This might take the form of demanding the

immediate withdrawal of our garrison, which consisted mainly of a Gurkha

battalion, stationed there which we should have difficulty in accommodating

elsewhere. On the other hand, there should be no delay to our plan for

withdrawing our garrison in the autumn of 1968 and our aim should

continue to be to free ourselves as soon as possible from our commitment

to the external defence of Brunei, a commitment which we should have

increasing difficulty in meeting. It would also be advisable to give

the Australians, the New Zealanders and the Malaysians advance notice

of our intention to abrogate the Agreement.

The Committee were advised that it was not necessary to give notice of

termination of the Agreement on the anniversary of its signature. The

Agreement contained no provision for termination, and it was therefore

essential to give reasonable notice. Two years notice from any specific

date could be held as reasonable under international law.

THE PRIME MINISTER, summing up, said that the Committee agreed that

it would be inadvisable at present to implement their decisions of

28th July on Brunei; formal advice to the Sultan on the need to

democratise the constitution of Brunei should not be given, and notice of

termination of the Agreement should be deferred for the time being.

question should be reviewed early in 1968.

The

The Committee

(1) Agreed that formal advice should not be given to the

Sultan of Brunei on constitutional progress and that formal notice of termination of the 1959 Anglo-Brunei Agreement should not be given at present.

(2) Agreed to review the question again early in 1968.

-2-

Page 275

Page 275

CONFIDENTIAL

Share This Page