SECRET

Page 48

might favour a republican regine and constitutional arrangements on apartheid and authoritarian lines. Mr. Smith had now published a misleading

White Paper on the "TIGER" talks and had offered sops now seen to be unconvincing - to the moderates by proposing to lift censorship "provided satisfactory alternatives to safeguard national security can be devised"

and to set up an "impartial tribunal" to review detention orders. At the

same time, to meet the extremists, he had announced the appointment of an

"impartial independent commission to report on the new future Constitution"

with a hint that the system Rhodesia needed was one of separate development

of the different communities. There had been some pressure from the Governor

on us to seize the "opportunity" for a settlement before the regime

finally closed the door. Meanwhile the Africans in Rhodesia were withdrawing

from the political scene by largely failing to register as voters.

As regards the United Kingdom Government's position, this had been

defined in the Prime Minister's own successive statements from 20th December

onwards, but questions continued to be put in Parliament on the subject and there

was a danger that the individual answers which had to be given on such

occasions might compromise our future position as a whole unless this

had been clearly thought out in advance. There was little that the

United Kingdon Government could do at present on the political front

except to make their position as regards a settlement clear.

It was

however for consideration whether there would be advantage in repeating on a suitable occasion in connected form points made in previous separate

statements. It would also be useful to consider further and in more detail

what the implications of previous statements were, in particular in regard

to a return to constitutional rule and the possible formation of a

broad-based government by Mr. Smith.

In discussion the view was expressed that while there would be advantage in considering further for our own purposes the implications of our policy for the restoration of constitutional rule, there were disadvantages in a

public restatement of our policy at this point. It was unrealistic to think

now in terms of Mr. Smith agreeing to a return to constitutional rule and the proposals for a broad-based interin government as a precursor of independence, as contemplated in the "TIGER" discussions, were no longer

apposite. We need not however insist on the establishment of a broad based

Government as a pre-condition of a return to constitutional rule and the abandonment of sanctions. Once there had been a return to the position

obtaining before the illegal declaration of independence on 11th November 1965,

d we could subsequently discuss with the lawful Rhodesian Government

measures of constitutional advance. As regards the grant of independence we were bound by the Commonwealth connunique of September 1966. If however

a new situation arose, for example the disruption of the illegal regime,it would be open to us to arrange for Commonwealth Prime Ministers to consider these terms anew.

Page 48

-2-

SECRET

Page 48

Share This Page