-
**
$
2
74
Ca
protest, which I had forwarded to
Protest of the lebuk of bouncils, and a copy of jet March 1882 which Ienclose herein, that the question I wished to raise was one
which he
had already disposed of, any mirap- prehension, which he
on that subject,
tained
Entirely by his own
may
have enter
was caused
persistent,
rudi
bearing and, I regret to say, interruptions every
time I attempt
ed to speak. Your Lordship will per-
"Daily Press" ceive from the report of in the Daily Newspaper Press of the 23th February, a copy of 23rd Faby 1882 which I send herewith, that I was
to de
M
four separat occasions, abruptly stopped when attempting scribe to the bouncil the object of my intended motion, but that neverthe- less the Govenor was
formed by
if
distinctly in
me that he was mistaken.
he supposed I was about to recur to a subject which he had previously declared to be irregular.
The greation of privilege,
cm
upon which I desired to speak, cerned the relations which exist between the chair and members of the bouncil, a question as appositi
to