to raise a
discussion of the advantag of which there might be considerable doribt. Sannexe the papers about the 1859 precedent proted by die f Hennessy for 29 17 in Found volume), but
off 2917 the minutes of the Council for
hers
which would show
which Mr. Davies
the Li of Jan: 59. the grounds
m
was not allowed to las move
Lis
-x
(shall t
motion, are as the Record Office- be self-
affaren by the
is that case
objech of
an attack
the motion was an
afon Dr. Beidges-
In the House of
Commons such a motion would be
baca met by a refusal to produce
The papers.
ine wi tuch
& I cinay ine
case no discussion could
well
conto very Take place anfon a corres fondevice_ not before the House? Ithould have Hought that this would have been - for his J. Bennerry
the right.
Conse
Его
to pursue in the presente
there does not affian
case, but to be
any
copy of the Hory Kay Leg: Commil
VAL V
Ze Library
Standing Orders in the
So that I cannot tell whether hi
Hennery to be acting regulark regularly
actory on too. line he
لم
not in the
and.
30/3
I. des not think it is weapay to
the
Explaining
a
tune
That was
au
6 6859.
....
415
set ther rappen
Way
ups similar
the Courtuty will he att
would be done in mech
Joharis
to say Theat
Com
བོན
the Bain & Commons
I should have rapport that for ) . Hennessy
retter Thained
the applicatim 7.
sustation from May"`s but it was expedient to quash In Johannis motion if he comer find means of dring
Reusabl
It is within the prosion of the pectes
4.
question
upon the proper
grand
ہوئے
to reform
h-