Justice Russell
to
B Johnson
1st December 1881
My dear Johnson,
In reply to your
note
of this morning, I regret to state that I
have been informed is
quite
true
viz
that Dr Eitel made a
statement to me nearly a month be- fore the 20th September, which was substantially the same as that set out in the 6th paragraph of the petition
of Hayllar & Cotel.
I am able to
in the case
answer
your question at once, as the case is
now withdrawn.
rather notice of
withdrawal has been duly filed
in the Registry.
Believe me, yours very truly
(Signed) Russell
The Hon: F. B. Johnson
However, to follow the exact output format requested (HTML usingfor paragraphs), the corrected version is already provided above. To improve it further according to the given rules: 1. "1st Arcember 1881" is corrected to "1st December 1881". 2. "nots" is corrected to "note". 3. "quits" is corrected to "quite". 4. "you true" is rephrased to "quite true" for better readability. 5. "Certel" is corrected to "Cotel", assuming it's the correct spelling. Here's the revised version with some minor adjustments for better readability and adherence to the rules:
Justice Russell
to
B Johnson
1st December 1881
My dear Johnson,
In reply to your note of this morning, I regret to state that I have been informed is quite true, viz that Dr Eitel made a statement to me nearly a month before the 20th September, which was substantially the same as that set out in the 6th paragraph of the petition of Hayllar & Cotel.
I am able to answer your question at once, as the case is now withdrawn; rather, notice of withdrawal has been duly filed in the Registry.
Believe me, yours very truly
(Signed) Russell
The Hon: F. B. Johnson
This version merges some of the paragraphs for better readability and corrects the identified errors.