the hash contains
au
"immoral"
picture, although the other parent says he no longer approves this
principal reason
in the sole or for the quarrel.
It appears therefore
that the book was one wherein M Hayllar thought it worth while to conceal prose the Governor's
that he exhibited the
notere
picture to Lady Hennessy
See also
that
in the Governor's judgment the picture was "immoral"
that alone time this
assigned
including
and
as the sole reason per
der Haggard from
Government House.
This appeared
to me to be so serious
a
matter
T
Comparative
indifference whether the book was or was not the catalogue of the Musée Privée.
Dr Eitel says
That the Governor did not tell him that the catalogue was that
of
the Musée Privée, although he admits that the Governor qualified this before leaving Hong Kong.
All that Dr Eitel
22
at first said to Mr Johnson was That the book was
an illustrated
catalogue of pictures and statues
in the Museum at Naples containing
points of "Character".
A
most widecent
Mr Johnson appears
to have taken this to mean the
catalogue of the Musée Privée
and it was only upon Mr Johnson's saying that Dr Eitel must be mistaken, and that the book could only have been the ordinary catalogue that White said "No, there was no mistake " about it. It was not the ordinary
catalogue but it was a
of the Musée Privée.
"[
catalogue
This may
have been no more than unguarded admission. Dr Eitel was placed in a position in which it was difficult
to steer clear of rocks.
But the Governor does not merely say that Dr Eitel was not to say that it was the catalogue