untrice and
that
( 2 ) as to his responsible for Dr Viteli letter & 5 NW repudiating the
amuraly 7 Mphasis veracin of the convumber ist Sitel
I theick that bin I Amnesty & saying this letter was written to save litil pour Cening the Private Scenetaryship virtually admits that it was written of net of his dictition at least under pressure from him -
but
I do not see that he is to Hame for this if Eitel wild heir (and Fitil does not deny their
that the version who inaccurate
(3) as to the circumstances of the withdrawal
of the action-
Dr. Eitit afpims (per 39 that the froemer under prepare prem
&
lillery 27ther)
some paper or papers retractations which preventer
ur Low signed Containing
shewn two lellers
д
kein (Sitel) pom maintaining a plea I justification - and Mr Schurm in his letter of 7 Dec. say that he has hen
the Govemer in which Do Sititi stulements are declared to t
and so filed in par 41 Sis a gher lilled 9 27 Dee- speake, little from the frommer & ber
"Whelly untime" _
ar
yo
5 bebeyler
harto the terms of the compromise.
These papers and Attern tetiche in Itting maker an allusion in his despatch may hav Contained nothing
more than appears in
the
20
Statement evelered in 2583- but if they
With
weat further as a fitil seems fimply
ん
and retracted or denied the whole story
o the book the Grommor would be self-
Courite o falschord
I think in vice
so can mocare
gb
B. Citili
allegations
In I Ama
to
cught.
produce of he has theirs, copies of there
documento
(4) as to the relente in
DtFitil as Puribe.
Scouting after the institution of the action
Jaccount I think that the foremen's viny (if hue) ins that team up to the time when he accepted
s Sitel's resignation kitit avowed his abilif 4 prove the inaccuracy & Wharon's version & their
han a sufficient Explanation the latter acepting
Meer conversation. but the terms of the letter
Ita
resignation
Susted by Schlel in for 23 of the letter g
consistent with thes
27 Dec. are scaruly account as the reasons alleged for accepting it are these stated y Wlitil is a billin 7 4 NW ? _ written therefore at the time he was "avouring the incercelness & Wharmis version.
and are much more Crisisbut with t. Vitili
sting that the his fHennefing was acting willing under pressure pan cho Low
To sum up
unz
I think that s fitil should in her own admissions to dismissed pour the Pattie Sonrie and that the froemer should b called upon for perther and more precise statements on the paints I hair meatione