in China, the substance of which was communicated
to you in my letter marked Immediate of the 17th instant, Earl Granville is of opinion that no further instructions to the Governor of Hong Kong on the thirteen
Chinese fugitives from Hong Kong are now required. Justice Law, in reply, observes that Sir Thomas Wade, in the Telegram above referred to, while stating that he had
communicated to Sir John Pope Hennessy, when staying at Peking last month, the Government's opinion relative to the case, omits to say what that opinion is; and under these circumstances, Lord Granville, without full information, is unable to answer your question. His Lordship would
suggest for the consideration of the Earl of Kimberley the desirability of ascertaining from Sir J. Pope Hennessy, in the first instance, what
Corrected text in HTML format as per the instructions: 1. 'Which' capitalized to 'which' as it is not the beginning of the sentence. 2. 'Dastant' corrected to 'instant'. 3. 'distructions' corrected to 'instructions'. 4. 'are now requireds' corrected to 'are now required'. 5. 'obrewe' corrected to 'observes'. 6. 'Stating' corrected to 'stating' as it is not the beginning of the sentence. 7. 'ds' corrected to 'is'. 8. 'food' corrected to 'Lord'. 9. 'fullen' corrected to 'full'. 10. 'dark' corrected to 'Earl'. 11. 'theat' corrected to 'what'. The output is in HTML format using `` for paragraphs. The original text has been proofread according to the given rules, correcting spelling errors, fixing spacing issues, and rejoining broken sentences while preserving the original content and structure as much as possible.