for do Rimberley in his minute

JM

Sou

ідчив радо

the Forces Offer Amst dare what is & be done;

Ipwppose therefore that this despatch with the annexures comes in original (the returned) papers be sent forthwith

At 470 we

with Lord Gransithe's memo

h

Causen

the whole

X

(It is annis & note Love to "de planchols make at that Lord Pombalazs may explicit tilage

of hoogh q

"no torture after during Trial

only way of Punishment" left & loophole

Condemnahon",

to torturs " before condemn ahen

ahin?").

Gut FEBRE

The Diplomatists pr. 296- had only the Marquis Tsong

telypam to guich them to the conclusion on for. 298

-

Reither to Sir I. Leads fr. 241 - nor to WW. Hewlett p. 225 he does they

does Sir J. Hemelry transmit Low Himberlys tilyram,

he does not inform the latter fr-226 that the conditions of surrender have been laid down by dnikimbuly-

The then were Eventually discharged not on account Of their long detention, but because the Viceroy's demand for rendition pr. 41. was much furthered by the Government

the magistrate which would have given kim

the word "Lady

Laws in ties 10 t

homing from Kumbreting Jay Shem

W Hourlite

Juh (m";

353

Jurisdiction - and because the magistrate (M. Tonnochy) did not take the trouble to see That the other formalities (viz. complaint or information) without which a magistrate could give him jurisdiction had been properly taken. The Viceroy says p. 43 that his policemen have arrested the criminals at Hongkong and taken them on the spot.

It seems hereon that Constable Mr Muller pr. 15. Actually Effected the arrest - apparently without warrant.

This took place

at Koulun side of the harbour, quite near

Hasan

him, as the men were only a few yards from

Chinese territory

an

They might have escaped during the delay in getting a warrant.

but the Governor & the magistrate

bekwamen

Must divide the blame of the breakdown of the

Cate

The Viceroy's demand was

before the

Attorney General with the other papers: do his opinion of Jan..

10. long

justifiere.

I think we must say something about the double neglect in this case, though it has lately shifted

from Embarrassment at a later stage.

K Munch

Meanwhile 7. F.Ó. as Jurpoul –

M.25/2 but he 27

н

28879-

Share This Page