You assert, were supplied to the -། the think, has "Editor by some officer of Government who, you abridged his position by affording this information to the Public Press; and this is the special reason you give for desiring to appeal to a Court of Law.
The Governor desires ) 499 facts before the Executive by whom they would be investigatis.
To inform that copies of the various official papers relating to Immigration which had been printed for the Legislative Council and for transmission to Australia were supplied to him by the Governor's authority at the request of the Editor of the Hongkong Telegraph.
2. To remind you that the proper course for you to adopt in endeavouring to deal with the Officer of the Government who, you imagine, has abused his official position by affording information to the Public Press injurious to your character, is to lay the facts before the Executive.
As there was nothing in those printed papers or extracts to object to, you have seen that these printed papers gave only extracts from certain reports, and that they entirely omitted the Government letter of the 26th of April.
Here is the revised version in HTML format as requested:You assert, were supplied to the think, has "Editor by some officer of Government who, you abridged his position by affording this information to the Public Press; and this is the special reason you give for desiring to appeal to a Court of Law. The Governor desires facts before the Executive by whom they would be investigated.
To inform that copies of the various official papers relating to Immigration which had been printed for the Legislative Council and for transmission to Australia were supplied to him by the Governor's authority at the request of the Editor of the Hongkong Telegraph.
2. To remind you that the proper course for you to adopt in endeavouring to deal with the Officer of the Government who, you imagine, has abused his official position by affording information to the Public Press injurious to your character is to lay the facts before the Executive.
As there is nothing in those printed papers or extracts to object to, you have seen that these printed papers gave only extracts from certain reports, and that they entirely omitted the Government letter of the 26th of April which.
Upon reviewing the original task, I realized that my response should directly follow the instructions given for the output format, which is HTML using `` for paragraphs. I corrected minor OCR errors and reformatted the text accordingly. Here is the final output in the requested HTML format:
You assert, were supplied to the think, has "Editor by some officer of Government who, you abridged his position by affording this information to the Public Press; and this is the special reason you give for desiring to appeal to a Court of Law. The Governor desires facts before the Executive by whom they would be investigated.
To inform that copies of the various official papers relating to Immigration which had been printed for the Legislative Council and for transmission to Australia were supplied to him by the Governor's authority at the request of the Editor of the Hongkong Telegraph.
2. To remind you that the proper course for you to adopt in endeavouring to deal with the Officer of the Government who, you imagine, has abused his official position by affording information to the Public Press injurious to your character is to lay the facts before the Executive.
As there is nothing in those printed papers or extracts to object to, you have seen that these printed papers gave only extracts from certain reports, and that they entirely omitted the Government letter of the 26th of April which.