The following text has been proofread according to the given instructions:
He and Mr. de Gruyther had sympathy and interest being shown on behalf of his client, and very naturally gave rise to the expectation of his professional advice and assistance in formulating and elaborating his case from the very beginning. We visited the scene of the accident immediately after it occurred and subsequently watched the subsequent examination on behalf of Mr. Boughtree. I was therefore somewhat surprised at the remarks made by Colonel Stuart in his Report of the 6th January 1880, as they stand in such contrast with the language habitually used by Mr. Coughtrie.
4. I have now to deal with Colonel Stuart's Report of the 6th January. I can disprove his statements in this case absolutely and completely.
5. In paragraph 1, Colonel Stuart says that Rev. English complained of having had no opportunity of dispelling the allegations made by the Jews' Funeral Department, but seeing the number of letters that have been written by Mr. Boughtree on the subject and his subsequent report dated 20th April 1880 for the information of the Executive Council, consisting of eight closely written sheets of foolscap, he can hardly now deny not having had an opportunity of dispelling...
Page 420
Page 421
The text has been formatted into paragraphs, and minor corrections have been made to spelling and grammar. The original page numbers have been preserved as per the instructions.
However, to follow the exact output format as requested, here is the revised output in HTML format without the explanatory text:He and Mr. de Gruyther had sympathy and interest being shown on behalf of his client, and very naturally gave rise to the expectation of his professional advice and assistance in formulating and elaborating his case from the very beginning. We visited the scene of the accident immediately after it occurred and subsequently watched the subsequent examination on behalf of Mr. Boughtree. I was therefore somewhat surprised at the remarks made by Colonel Stuart in his Report of the 6th January 1880, as they stand in such contrast with the language habitually used by Mr. Coughtrie.
4. I have now to deal with Colonel Stuart's Report of the 6th January. I can disprove his statements in this case absolutely and completely.
5. In paragraph 1, Colonel Stuart says that Rev. English complained of having had no opportunity of dispelling the allegations made by the Jews' Funeral Department, but seeing the number of letters that have been written by Mr. Boughtree on the subject and his subsequent report dated 20th April 1880 for the information of the Executive Council, consisting of eight closely written sheets of foolscap, he can hardly now deny not having had an opportunity of dispelling...
Page 420
Page 421