I a white vol:& Colonel Stuart's at
p.p. 27:
32059
of the latter, & the Arbitrator's Report at p. 171.
I may further call attention to the Acting Attorney General's opinion on the legal aspect of the claim (6.41) & some antecedents & letters reflecting on Mr Price's delays in reporting on pp. 85-87. I have also added pencil references in the margin of the Desp: to the pages White vol: referred to by
the case
He
The Governor.
From p. 89 of the three vol: the contents appear with topure exceptions to be the same as on the white vol..
Mr. Cough the original (of which a faint is given
referent memorial However ab
in his family)
6.94, the further observations by dat Coughlin
the in important evidence taken
by the Arbitrator including
Coughtime's, Mr M Kein
& Mr Dowdle's contention.
El
362
I Watt
behalf of the harvey on fencial:
Debts are
to be
found only in
The three volume. (Places marked) the points of difference not Satisfactorily cleared up In Coughlin
1. that the new drain brought
an addition
of water too great for the old drain to carry away.
2. that the Inesting was immediately caused by the old drain getting choked up with boulders and being out of repair (Her duty wults widence), & by the displacement of the two large stones by the force of water
Sat. Rice.
1. That it was
large enough & with fall enough &
away
carry, three times the
quantity. 2. that the drain
was not choked with sand or boulders & could not have been. to the wish of
water
being very great. two latter
that the stones
were displaced by
The water