the munster say something
about the alleged bite
of $15,000
K
the manager
frand of the form Rm 15/5.
former.
arnice
Mr Meade
The Attorney General's report has now
come & is annexed;
385
Litigation;
we have received here
affic Papers.
4
for notice the matter in the London'd
4
China Telegraph of d 8
January Cost (herewith)) I then was watching papers for
"
fuller reports
on t
Asuvation.
only deals with
the "special jury" charge in par. 6 Mr Nelson's letter.
Therewith
The suit of Pilman v. Houshing Club (par. 13 of Mr Nelson's letter) is now concluded; see China Telegraph (h) of May 16. p.405; the Plaintiff losing, but each side
The "Opium " seems not to be paying costs.
204 Ended.
? Reply that Lord Kimberley sees no sufficient reason to institute Inquiry into the administration of justice in this case; and then refer to par. 2 of the despatch
For Treads
& Jaucerd.
ar
above.
G.W. I.
24 May
with regard to your question what the
outting has fallen
Mt Meade
lan oles
48 May 26.
The Attorney General
has satisfactorily explained his
refusal to take
Summoning
AC
any
steps for
special during
upon Mt Nelson's applications.
Nevertheless the thing
Justice summed up for the conviction of der Pitman who was convicted by
by the Jury
accordingly. So far Mer helson has
Farm
no ground of complaint
Bond although