There recommended been accepted, it would have had to be have been
receipt subsequently readjusted on
the basis of the Despatch referring
"Estimates
therefore that this Pension will be approved? but perhaps it may be thought desirable
to call attention at the same time to the point I have mentioned? [We have already in 105-15 any
0 11703 of 79 want of remarks & explanations
complained of the
$
I believe the Estimate
were more
satisfactory
a.a.d
19/2
for 20
in this
When we leave this he person may
be approved.
When
minor details have been
referred
If in the covering letter to Johnstone for 1879 the
Estimate has been approved by Pearson
SWR J&G
O AL
the foregoing tore Colonial home without any
he had returns, remarks & explanation down
which helps & deal will
such portions; And such
18
confining the Estimates we told him so, as stated & above.
See despatch one
11203/75
The disapproval in 1120.3 shall have been set to right when 12740/79 and 14401/80
Refer
were written
[ and cleared para 2 of a despatch 20 105 of the 15 Augt 1879 and make the remarks suggested
Dear Sir,
Mr. Meade
Our Copy
See foregoing Minute.
On this assumption that the increase in the rate of salary will be acquiesced in I am not aware of
any reason why this pension of $408-88 per annum, from 29 Oct 1880
entirely, should not be
approved the
remarks in
be sanctioned.
f/u on to 8/2.23/2/1
Ru