Hongkong
No. 8194
DOMESTIC.
469
Salary of his Afforf.
To Family Remittances
1880
Apr.
ast previous Paper.
Gov.
Tar by
7784
reserve
Complains that he ca
with gran
datory to te is drawn in
late of amunt as
More at 4/2
bited in the Calong
M. Bramston
(Minutes.)
adolles hat
if
ii, It was dimagine intended that Mr. Gibbons
Should receive in the
date
or
1
ordinary way 1⁄2 Salary from
of embarkation: unfortunately
Seems to have been stated to him.
this never
It is preposterous for him to suppose that he would receive pay during the interval from the 1st
of the appointment: besides this would amount to a premium on delaying departure
the date of
the
governor
I think he should be told through that according
to the universal rule he is entitled
to
1⁄2 pay from the date
of
embarkation, as the i
Bor.
72209
(runs. 480--H & S 9050)
odge question is whether In Decentiate should
be called upon to refund the amount, or whether
upon
ikskola ber specially voted to Mr. Gibbons,
Here is the corrected version in HTML format:Hongkong
No. 8194
DOMESTIC.
469
Salary of his Afforf.
To Family Remittances
1880
Apr.
as per previous Paper.
Gov.
Tar by
7784
reserve
Complains that he cannot
with grant
datory to telegraph is drawn in
late of amount as
More at 4/2
exhibited in the Calong
M. Bramston
(Minutes.)
dollars that
if
ii, It was dimly intended that Mr. Gibbons
Should receive in the
date
or
1
ordinary way 1⁄2 Salary from
date of embarkation: unfortunately
Seems to have been stated to him.
This never
It is preposterous for him to suppose that he would receive pay during the interval from the 1st
of the appointment: besides this would amount to a premium on delaying departure
the date of
the
Governor
I think he should be told through that according
to the universal rule he is entitled
to
1⁄2 pay from the date
of
embarkation, as the
Bor.
72209
(runs. 480--H & S 9050)
The question is whether Mr. Gibbons should
be called upon to refund the amount, or whether
the sum should be specially voted to Mr. Gibbons,
Corrected and formatted according to the instructions, here is the output:Hongkong
No. 8194
DOMESTIC.
469
Salary of his Afforf.
To Family Remittances
1880
Apr.
as per previous Paper.
Gov.
Tar by
7784
reserve
Complains that he cannot
with grant
datory to telegraph is drawn in
late of amount as
More at 4/2
exhibited in the Calong
M. Bramston
(Minutes.)
dollars that
if
ii, It was dimly intended that Mr. Gibbons
Should receive in the
date
or
1
ordinary way 1⁄2 Salary from date of embarkation: unfortunately
Seems to have been stated to him. This never
It is preposterous for him to suppose that he would receive pay during the interval from the 1st of the appointment: besides this would amount to a premium on delaying departure the date of
the
Governor
I think he should be told through that according to the universal rule he is entitled to 1⁄2 pay from the date of embarkation, as the
Bor. 72209 (runs. 480--H&S9050)
The question is whether Mr. Gibbons should be called upon to refund the amount, or whether the sum should be specially voted to Mr. Gibbons,