For arriving at the decision Schmer how came
Jun H
Sec. off. after consultation with F.O. (who have ascertained from Chinese authorities already acting then) the Governor's view & de merits at least shall have informed This point Sheen Sen, oppose still more of his assumed to appear.
For Woden.
Js. 2016.
I don't understand the question
but was workers
Mortemque justified
without reference Rorke
Shelving & The par 5 of gay stat of
which
appointment
in
negotiations & of Lovertly carried
out
lither the
The Junk hade
considered & be
See minute
3
mint kmice &
am 40743
"
9 I cannot
make not dis is All 10/6
unlikely the would have
written por
justification.
Mr Meade
6 intent was
trace of
those
I do not find any rules having reached Governor Hennessy with
& perusal of our approval of them and perhaps he therefore considered himself at liberty to disregard them
any
Sir Hennedy
approved I then When Sir J. Wade came to Hong Kong
235
if he did not approve of them himself. Sir B. Robertson had sent them to Sir Hennessy same time before 5 March 1878 the date of his despatch transmitting them to Lord Derby. From that despatch it seems that Sir B.R. regarded the rules as subject to Mr Hennessy's approval of
Whose decision he had not then despatched
received. From the same
" it appears that Sir B.B. was coming home without waiting for Sir Hennessy's decision
they fell through. I don't
understand the statement in Sir
M. Hicks Beach's despatch of 7 Nov 29 Margy, Cass that the rules appeared from
Sir J. Wade's despatch of the 28th of
now in force". I should
the now
May 19th
79
have inferred the contras
F.O. in
7248/79
Lada Lokich ws
Nr 10/6
that the Bucks won't agree to be the ons. I, the Governor, & the Viceroy of Canton; & possibly Sir