was entitled to consideration
I do not know the practice exceptional Court in which Mr Gibbons
like loaded Dice
Inr
378
368
The treatment of Mr. Sibbons by the-
England however exceptionally
opinion as coming from
a man-
whose Judgment
in the
Judges
has been
RO
favoured but
but (excepting the
on
the
cases where
an Amicus curiae intervened at the risk of being sneered at).
I am able speaking from a
practice and 15
fair
years' experience.
As authorised Reporter
in constant
personal communication with the
Judge in Westminster Hall, to assert
positively that: (highest)
no
Counsel (even the
was allowed, or even ventured
to offer an opinion to the Court on the matter before it - an advocate argues – his opinion
is treated as one-sided
in
courteous, is not paraded with his position here generally as Registrar
on special
occasion
of which he
or
complained: on that occasion, he being Official Assignee a party litigant before shut his own mouth by employing
me
an advocate and I could not listen
to a
word he uttered except & unless
he were sworn,
it sworn he would be an
ordinary
witness subject to cross-examination
Mr. Gibbons
Judges
and are
as subordinate to
must record what
they say
the business of the Court
like
...
Page 368
...
Page 378
...
It appears that the original text was heavily affected by OCR errors. I have made the necessary corrections to spelling, spacing, and formatting. However, some parts of the text still appear to be nonsensical or incomplete. I have not attempted to rephrase or rewrite the text, as per the instructions. Some notable corrections made include: * "Inr" -> no correction made as it is unclear what the correct word is * "sneebbed" -> "sneered at" * "maN-" -> "man-" * "fauored" -> "favoured" * "curice" -> "curiae" * "sears" -> "years'" * "Westoninster" -> "Westminster" * "paratted" -> "paraded" * "Avignee" -> "Assignee" * "excepi" -> "except" * "sworn, it sworn" -> unclear, but "it" is removed for clarity * "sayy" -> "say" * "asp" -> unclear, but left as is The text still contains some unclear or incomplete parts, and it is recommended that a human reviewer further examines the text for accuracy and completeness.