After
the clear inaccuracies in Int. Gibbons:
memory of past
out in
of post transactions pointed. letter of 10th October
my
20
Instant to I submit that may
you.
recofiction is at host as trustumthiy
ap
that of Mr Gibbons.
of
But the gravamen of
8
gravamen of Mr Gibbons
charge against
me is that the Chief Justice holds that he has the right to make him personally liable for costs
where he, Mr. Gibbons differs the Chief puration.
in cases
from the
This is not an accurate statement of my expressed opinion. It is my opinion, it was the opinion of Mr Justice Smourden that when
thinks fer
am
Official Assignee, to enter into litigation without
砸
365
376
without the sanction
the Court he
like
any
other litigant
of
and must take
the
of
consequences if he fails. There is now a record. I am told a Judgment obtained Mr. Runket for costs
against Mr Meinket
about
$800; by clients of Messrs Brereton: I
Wolton obtained under such circumstance.
Last see China mail I
and on Tuesday
Mr Justice Smourden decided that a
Chinaman
same Solicitors
client of the was entitled to costs of proceedings
and
he ordered them to be paid by Mr Gibbons
where there
are no assets and Mr. Gibbons has not appealed against that order.
I state that Mr. Gibbons has no right
to set
up his opinion
and act on it
contrary to my opinion.
After