249
359
the question of Stuffori's status for decision by the Court. I told Mr. Gibbons
that no Brereton had as my presence
him direction which I understand he
would act
Petition and to
to adopt and a deep
thee
arrange
with Mr Brereton
a greed
t
argue
the question
behalf
for
the
argument before
rrr k
the ded
of the Creditors
in hypoll still ly
A J
d
test
Case
a
agreed
to act
Corest might
nd that no Plunket had
ar
such order
the
Ke
The decision
after full argument, if in his favour,
would fully justify the Repatriation to
to be official assignee; if it would be urgent grounds
a e sa va te
adverse,
for passing
rest the ex later
Ordinance to effectually,
in the Repatriation
as Official Assignee. expressed objection to the
Mr. Gibbons
course but
took the petition away, I giving
him
nothing of the kind, but without
informing
artx
of what he proposed to
do or had done, he wrote the letter of
ri
B
the 13 of May
with
Reference
last by me (it is right
to my Gibbons charges above
referred to, to note the date as
being
before the latter end of May) of which I send copy herewith in which avouching himself of the information I had given
him as to Stuffori,
he has
but ignoring
me
Ad
from his own
investigation
brought the
with a
matter before the Governor
view to legislative action
In
That
'ec