Mr. Plunket's removal became necessary in consequence of the Report on the Supreme Court: Minutes on 14810, a following up the telegram of 29th Oct. 19.
Won worth on 30 on 14810 par. 6. = He has however been harmless to the Magistracy, & it is my intention to select for the post an English Solicitor.
Nevertheless, I have deter Julen Gray as Acting Magistrate until assignee ghittons ason now beam Hilton on the all the duties of the ... to ... When that he was performing Office (of Registrar) – In Brick of fact the Chief Justice writing in Oct. 18. /80 (18925) days he was overwhelmed with work & anxiety doing in the want of a Registrar, whose appointment was delayed so long, it being impossible for the two Deputy Registrar's to demonstrate "Carry on the daily work of the Office, which "They did well, not venturing to grapple " with arrears short handed as The Pain "was due to want of a Permanent Registrar"=-
Is it worth while to take any notice of this obviously unsatisfactory arrangement for his benefit op. Plunket alone? Some Junior should have a chance from his magistracy, if so the Govt. have not made it sufficiently clear that Plunket son than the Supreme Court – Should it's being worth the touch, we know the confusion in the Civil Service is extremely like chaos: &
The only notice of Jobation Plunket & Alfande: & an Order would have with effect.
As to mh 108 - Lately Assuming that Dr. Plunket was performing all the duties of Registrar; it is straining this case to firm him the junior post of Magistracy with half the pay - Does it show well in the same Office to contemplate a junior doing his own work temporarily that of an absent Superior as in the Post Office nett - Interns in 18919 - which Lee & minulin $1.28/12. Jagen Stients St. with white, especially M. 9. was continuing to discharge the duties of Reg. a Art, Ing. until Mr Gobbon's arrival & is now dead.
Page 155
Rebak pozoru Rm 1/1 atom Fut by a mur Dec.