conduct in this case, with the fact that
he is now complained of by D. Ayres does that way, he
such influence
the latter is right in his quarrel
with his
that subordinate; and I must say the way the correspondence opens and
What is admitted as to the previous relations of the parties, it looks to me as if there was some spite in D. Ayres's original attack on D. Wharry for practising privately, seeing he has in past days participated in consulting as much as he called in D. Wharry's and
in dealing with his
own patients. I suspect he found D. Wharry
useful in more than
(a) in consultation –
who books is an able man;
Wharry, who
is evidently also
572
practice. D. Wharry
bitter, and
the relations when the two are such
as cannot lead to continue with due regard to the public service.
I am inclined to tell Chief Police Magistrate that he is not free from partiality
as much as he appears
in the case, bringing
nothing but harassment
which is an
duty of a superior, and
when he
changed
his sides in the middle of the quarrel
tended to widen the existing
breach,
and I would direct him to see the two officers and to hear them.