I suppose the will be dealt with in the general, omitting he 15 A Mor Dep. The data come 1616- and pay paragraph and printed paper commencing with the th. Minute of Sir Mr. Macdonnell of 9 January 1872, which, as turde Robech observes, ought not to have been introduced.
A 6The circular of 24 Feb., see 14516 the reply. Mr Hennessy seems quite away! of the gross outrage against official decorum on Subordinate Officer of award which he has committed in allowing another with all this personal P. Vinileme in which the official publisher in the future 1451 Souette. He speaks of Mr Indis defending his Dept; but such a defense is wholly inadmissible. It is time that Mr Price (when in favour had made some with the Govt.) remarks upon the Botanical dept of A.. mild character & it would have been better if in publishing in the Gazette he had struck out any papers of an argumentative character & taken from Mr Tod documents.
Such as he has penned much less in the law in the South. It is to be regretted that this document is only forwarded 10 months after date? All the foregoing despatches directly or indirectly personal grievances & disingenuity in getting up & fomenting grievances is remarkable. I think he should be sorely reprimanded.
I am sending on with this 2 other despatches about Dr Keswick and The City Irregular also personal questions. There are none from Sir J. Pope Hennessy. Date: 28/9.
boolfo de fricent the most special qualification, former) : small & free and save