It is, I think, most unlikely that I Marsh direct defiance of the Sectiory of States' instructions has attempted to raise beaut
Salary from $1500
separate
to £ 1750 by pacis insating the old salary
vis £2500
the Auditor in the estimates in addition to that
4
viz£100
of the Colonial Secretary,
nor is it to Come
Supposed that he broke up his #1500 per
₤1250
under the colonial
under Auditor general:
250 under
annum.
putting
Seaetary
and ₤250
I offer
two explanations, litter
is quite sufficient
which
the
took the
is that in making the first draft of 180 Estimates in marsh simply
for his model (all of which have this itern) and for got to strike out the Sum in question
old ones
(ii) In the sixth paragraph of
the Estimates'
despiatich Mi Hennessy states that it will
not be possible to save any thing wonder the Audition's department,
because Mi
Maush had found it necessary
Sum
ๆ
£250
Auditor to pay
631
to keep the
originally
voted for the
-ongly in the office
a gid cleek not previ-
This I expect is the explanction but if
It is not thought Sufficient the point should. be raised in the despatch as M. Hen;
∙ressy's imputation is a serious one
should be cleared up.
CP.d
8. mars
کی
I think that det Lucas's & planation (1)
is the probable
one
J
but I do not
understand that Sir M. Hich Beach
wither the paint to he especially notier,
and perhaps it maghe allowed to drop
Br 9 Mar
Mutt Mar 13
I did not intend the port to be mitiert:
لسه
no dubt, it is caf alle off
exfel conating
ingsuted
Junel 17
Inneh
the
Way
F