Stems to think outterwice I beg to make a lew
fuse umarks on the wideuce.
With regard to the charge contamed in
ite wordence
the 1th Sant, it hinges Entireli
T
of Lems. King ham. That ares he pay against
the
ether pray Le that "in the morning on the,
Says day he came to the house and asted we And him $.0. I promvied to And him the Eum. It's words on the recasion were "You
are to get $20 pramity lend me $10 out of it
will weluru it in a mouth or pot. That
thors that the monkey was not extorted from him, but that be parted with the tuney, Cohmbarch, in the shape of a loaw _ Its also states that be asked me in the sheet for
payment of the wow, but I did not complic
with his request. I declare that he had rever asked me directly or indirectly
before
407
69
life I heard the complaint le made to fr
-
Sibel. He has no bitnees to support bis statement on this point, and I submit
hood is fist as good as his. I trust that Itso Excellency will not get a greater weight to hi's stalcinent than to home. With regard to The letter alleged by Seung hing have to have been peut to me, I can swear, prcitiorly thick I never received or saw it. The first time I
Juin any thing about it was that I can
the traph leller in the lands
* LKL - of dung kuns ham pays that he got no anowir
I the alleged litter. If auch a formal letter with five names in it had been peut to me, is it Whely that I would have lation no
rohet of it? I say that the dralt bellet has been drawn ups purperley to make bchiol
that a
beitet of such tenor was sent to mee
Which