I. with regard to the 2nd count wherein
This was done in a
ore Lau
James as
I am charged with obtaining "from
Sui Shang the sum of $10 under the name
of
If a ban, you not having any intention to churn the daid money and that you refaced
to return the money as borrowed by you though
refrend was appleed for ". I would respectfully
Hirve that ite charge is not, sulatantiated by
the stallcut
of an Em Chang. From his
Statement it does not appear chat bewer applied to his for repaw cent of the war anden that I ever refured to repay him. Its
a
maller of fact which I can prove Lan Sur Shang
کچھ
had borrowed money from me at different luies and repaid me. In February 1877, Imoving that he was going to receive a gratuity and bring in want of monrys at the time _ I asked him & oblige me with a loan of $10-
This
#
403
friendly way, in the rami obliged hem before –
3. With regard to the 3nd want, I
would humbly submit that any observations regarding the 1st and 2nd wounts applied with greater force here. My chank Exim from whim
( get the sum of $5 Expressly plated before the Committee that he had never asked wh for
repayment of the loan, therefore I could wit
have
possibly, refurred to return the money. I
hein
borrowed from
4. This alleged that I took indices
advantage of any position
i
as issistant Master
of the Central School in obtaining theed osus
in
that
February 1877, but I would point out the
in that ofear there were five schoolmecters who each oblamed the 7th Class gratuity of $25 and of who get the 2nd Class gratuity of