56712491.
Sisternapey was asked thow
можетири
how the statement as of the tale of the homans child, which the dew
The
pecial attention, hears upon question whether certain officers " the Register Genrali Dept shaved
prosecuted
the replies by making a gustation with which we were
from a report
already will arguainted.
Не
doult lep
back ponit
drew attention of the
in order to create
animus against you the Rijntion gural. But, as has already haw stated, this Officer was only doing what the Law compelles him to do in fining the Wornan. He had nothing Ado with the wornay, selling her child - Supporing that she did to, for modifying
this
may
bea
reason
the Law but would not be
a reason
for the Regrition general friting & do his?
C
152
duty in Executing the Lard. Certainly
ir umeonorbe a reason
fr
praecuting the officer for doing his duty.
But the sideme that the
child to pay
nomair sold her child
pay the
ų
the womnew
debt is very shaky. It consite
of a statement made
when sething to hater d herself
of the importions of a second fine,
an recasion when a woman of this Mind would not be likely to stick at a trifle.
tifle, & it is adopted without corroboration by the Commigimers who merely theme that "It is said" link the woma sold her child. It is not at all
that a woman
infortable that this clap. to pay this.
would sell her child' Aher delt,
any
ossen & make money.
In fact Mnr Hennepin's despatch