87
1
which, I think, weed not be re and
and the original letters from the
P.d.0.Co.qwhich are printed copin.
A
then other papers, to which
I would invite thecial attention and which I hand on in the following order, and.
first litter
The G.P.O.
porn
which that Dept. Expresses
it's
་
leaming towards Holt's of tenders. and to which is annexed a protest from the War office against the abandonment of the Gabr. & balto
contract service.
(2) the second letter from the P.0.
anchoring
unemorial
From London
merchants da. against the any
division of the Easter Service into
sections.
р
India Office
(3) Un remarks often (4) The P.LO. Cog's letters (printed)
J.
(5) Schedule of the PL0. tenders (6) Comparison of proposed service. (4 PLO! with existing service.
2 (7)
Schedule
of
Holto tenders.
the matter is diimplifeed
by the following considerations. Although the form of tender
separate admitted to oposals for
different sections, the Q.P.O seem (from their letter) to
concede to the protest ofther
merchants against breaking
up the Service. The G.P.O. therefore put out of the question this tenders of
the Sun Cox of Smilte
no partial
DAD
mitte of
Glasgow. For the same
reason, the Cast & Lenders