2.
against licensed brothers in Wellington Strat
in April 1871.
The Honorable Mr. Swith
in his letter of the 27th November 1877 writes
F
thus about it..
11
I gather from it that Drishop Reimandi
gives
his countenance to improper and
and untrue statements published in the
Homphony Catholic Register of 300 Surtant,
Ясли
can only expres
#
Father Borgazzi wrote thus:_
431
His Lordship wishes sue to call the attention
your Resellency to the fact that since suit
1871 the heach of this crispion together with other
respectible gentlemen residing in our
"han
signed a petition to the Governement cetime
the removal from Wellington street
all houses
Fill
of prostitution both licenced and unlicemen,
that they had a remery
}
it
my surprise that he
anwar was that they had a
after
His Excellency's
should have gone so
remarks at the Council table condensatory
of the Article in question _"
I have to confers that I am
quite surprized to read the words ton
Smith
uris
in his answer to Father
Borgazzis letter
W
แ
in
the courts of new, for they said there was no
power in the Registrar Generals Venertement
to deal with wornan Kept by forciquers. But
what about the others that are licensed by the
"Sepiatur fenerals office itself. The complaine
has been resented
againct
over and over again and always
licenud and unlicenced provûtutes.
F