"
52.
Jour
would
would also call attention
to the re iteration of the i words " allowed to this exempre"
with
reference
Officers of the Court":"
a frundertent
1. Your Honour
will be
good enough to favour
-hime (the Governor ) with some
further explanations
as to th
circumstances under which
Kuffam
was allowed to escape . This, I would submit res question which
• preekfully,
is a
the Governor can best ansurar himself, although by constantly Papping upon it he seeks to
throw the responsibility
J
I have
already pointed out
that having formed the opinion that the sepposed offence come defacebling.
under the
Trustee
کیه ای
a misdemeanour, and not unde
"the Darceny & Emberglement alanses of our L'arceny
ad a
Orduaner
- felony, the Allorney General
2.
abone could initiate proceedings
Bad 20
Coresi derd te
cade
to fall under the latter clauses do not know what other & better steps & could have taken
personally
to arrest the fugitive.
Within
331
Neither Dr. Molton or Mr. Goller would say
ہ ہے۔ ہور کے
information
and I had placed the matter
the hands off the legal adviser the Governor, who,
in
of
no doubt,
"feet the difficulty of acting
ہوتے ہیں
evidence ut second hands, and: in the absence of a profice information. I know of no power
I have as
Chief Justice to cause the correct
of any person of my for
A
Overr
motion
ur: under Jeet 65.
cris demeanour
I
conclusione, Freest be:
allaved ouee more
express
great regret with which I find myself compected to take the stop of laying this corres- pondence before you.
It is most distasteful
me to do so, as it is the first time
during nearly seven years service that I have found myself at variance with the Governot-
can alsure you, Sir, &
that I am not acting.
any feeling of personal annoyance whatever, but ou public grounds
of
and after great consederation what course I ought to take. Though the matter is in itself slight, tho has are
it
important bearing
Ott