453
!
uscles and out of place when the only on question is Is the manslaughter?
33.
crive nuurder
castă
As this beellency's publication canto
a reflection
on all contrued in the trial I feel it under the circumstances to be
trup
duty to declare that nothing which formere still could do to save
been
bhang a
Shine was lift undone and that the
Clain
defence
34
wvas
thing but a delusion.
to the duty
a-
n
anything This brigs are to the question of Sir John Senate's viewvo as the State ( not of the lenent) to provide the services of both Solicitor and bounsel, if not on all trials, at any rate ou all brials for a capital offence
35. In these
vreivs Tcannot
A citerely cover
boullent as they may be in the interests With and justice, they are scarcely consistent with the theory of trial. according to the present state of buglish law, which
since the passing of 64 ythe 4 € 14. in the case of trials for felonies – allows a prisoner to make full
aud
or
answer
charge of
d defence to the case for the prosecution by bouvel e attorney and one a unender mables hich to defend his life aganist the low as against another - forson who is assailing it. His boursel and Attorney
of
are
- justified in making
eau
suggest Einthian
every artifice skill ito limits of truth and profissional
of t
the
etiquette and hovor and legal rules to defeat the prosecution and protect guilt