comment of his
pure
The belief Justics opinion, as which I entirely concurred, was not, however, acted upore in the recent case upon
of Whang a Shin who
w to AAQO
convicted of ve
uurder and sentenced to death."
3
No one who reads the Gozetle can fail
to understand that by the publication of Sir John Anolis letter and the appended n remark. His becallawry intends to cowry sect quot sovelly but by way of inference the expression of his disapproval of the the strial of bleung-a-Blin
respect at any rate inasmuch as caused
was a only and not caused and a Soliciter was
oue
manner in which
ivao
conducted in
presigned for his defurces by the bart
4. This capession of this bandhwaja -
opinion necessar
bevallway's
tends to discredit the -..
335
efficiency of the lighest-Cinival bort in "This Placy the comportance of supporting on which, not only in point of fact; but also in public opinion.
MO OUe
da
فراد احمد میں کا
will
4
reopinge, more readily than tho baathway. His Excellency will therefore I fel... confident be glad to afford, me way opportunity of moking it quite clear that there is nove graund for the reflection thers cast upon the administration of Justice,
in the Supereince bount by the publication in the Gazette. 6. Persons est acquainted with the freto umat imagine that it is at the- "lement that this boolway's refonache is
7
leourt
directed.
not
Let us as what the arqucent an
be
mairidably to to infered is. It is as
follow