393
but this letter must how form the subject- of a separate communications.
I
bey to reply that I had not
previously seen the letter aeferred to although
A C
Cursorz look at the contents induced
me to think I had, and pay 20, 0wing
to
I
that I was
will acquainted with
the subject.
the fact Joher
Siv
hu Pucales mient
I had also long been perfectly familiar with a letter on a similar subject and- Expressing finitas velies dated September 1873. To this letter I shall have occasions
to refer at greater length in muy next
Communication.
year
John Smale had also lact spoken to me strongly about disallowance.
as renumeration for the services of the exttorney
and Connect he had requested to
ach for the defence of Jacomo and Packer who were tried for hurders.
I have
only learnt
very accently that the charge had subsequently been allowed in the pay
heeh.
Ihave to
(Signed) Francis Snowden
tching Chulp Justice .
of a
portion of the fee
be had pauctioned