138
189
118
do better than refer him to the prices
the hoo sheets
#M
column ho 8 18
of the
hereto attached and marked, pes-
pectively Appendix A and Appendix.
19.
These sheet's give the compara-
hoe cost
10 lineal feet.
of 10
design contained in
which A e co
feet of
the
bracing
Additional foot of depth.
The style of structure
submitted
for the consideration of the Consulting Engineer differs from the last in having the Roads covering in liner concrete in lies of cement concriter
given
and the estimate
of
Appendice C shows the relative cost
the three designs
the
%
the br mpanied Sir John Coode's Report to the (powns Agents for Colomies, of the 234? of May 18977 and
of another forms of wall submilled
by this Department and shown in the
Is me)
tracing
Both were
based on a
substructure.
of cement concute two feet deeps,
ra Le
and the same tout will apply to this
th me
kind.
foundations three fact
deep but after this depth the cost
will increase 15 per cent for every
additional
a v
follows; Sir
John Cooder being the first :
h: 1 for
ho z
h: 3
10 lineal feet of 624. 55
Jo
Do
$ 1188. 09 4188.09
434. 11
(signed)
I. M. Price
Surveyor General.
Альму