difficult to make nn & ceflion in her can: any how before deciding

Ichmeld Cile to know what

15 the 11

her incomes actually is. Pority be i

not

so

foor

refund similar requel.

whom we han

New H Sep. 27 Ju mer kap

Fage.

ev

ho the State

triided infortun

to carry that

without

pampere

thing form

Ram.

MINUTE PAPER.

386

I ful consider abh difficulty in deriding

on this question

I undustane Mr. Alexander's appeal to the founded on the exceptionally good a

long service rendend

to the

grant on

the ground of precedent need not be insuperable. Great services propuely require

by her husband? If so I mark

Ce

fall achumhdgment a & should not care much whether there was precedent or not in such a case. It is exceptional: but the question whellre those services were really such ach Entitle thein to such a

reward

next- if

I undustand the superaunecation_ hagment = part = of the question I am inchieed

I lean DM. Bramstion side. The State

t diducts a cutani portion of the salary of habbri rewant for sharified purpose, whit amongst othie things wirte be a direct benefit afficward the State changes to

E hem

A

mind, abandons that prepore and keeps

which was deducted from

the

mmig

the

Share This Page