5
be remanded. Witnesses, however,
• lawyer will remember the difference it makes rather to hear witnesses examined and see their demeanour from merely reading hurried notes of their evidence.
As to the 4th Convict, I have only to say
that the Court is of opinion that the prisoner, 16 years,
flogged.
was under he would not have been
and that the order of security has been the usual means of bringing before the Governor cases where the magistrate thought a prisoner should be sent but was not of the
I may assume, that if the
53
236
Attorney General's attention had been called to Section 22 of Ordinance No 10 of 1844, he probably would not have expressed doubt as to the legality of calling in a person for security when after conviction like now.
Signed J. Russell
Police Magistrate